Lead sourcing & enrichment
Find and enrich new prospects
Find people who fit your criteria, check them against Capable, and enrich only confirmed new prospects.
Copies a prompt for your AI assistant
Start wherever you are
Bring an idea, search criteria, or an existing list. Your agent helps you decide who to look for next.
Start with your AI assistant. Connect Capable and a data source before searching.
Fictional example
I want to find delivery leads at design agencies. Some will already be in our CRM.
What would make a new person useful to include, beyond their job title?
They should own the handover from sales to delivery. Let’s review a small sample before buying contact details.
Later in the example, after agreeing the criteria, CRM checks, sample, and enrichment budget
Illustrative outcome · sample reviewed
New prospects, with the checks visible.
A small sample shows who can move forward, who is already known, and what still needs a closer look.
All people, companies, and results below are fictional.
- Maya EllisDelivery lead · Juniper StudioNew · enriched
The agency team page identifies Maya as the sales-to-delivery handover owner. No matching person in the complete CRM check.
Work email added: maya@juniper.example. Not saved yet.
- Leo AndersHead of delivery · Form & FieldExisting · skipped
Profile URL matches a person already in Capable.
Excluded before enrichment. Existing record unchanged.
- Sam TaylorOperations lead · Kite StudioUncertain · held
Name and company suggest a possible CRM match; identity is unresolved.
Held for review. No enrichment purchased.
In this fictional run: 3 found · 1 enriched · 0 saved. Of the 3 found, 1 existing person was skipped and 1 uncertain match was held.
Agreed in this example
Review three UK agency handover owners first. Enrich only confirmed new people, within the agreed £5 limit.
Still to decide
Whether to save Maya and how to resolve Sam’s identity. This is illustrative data, not a live search.
Next useful step
Review Maya’s proposed record, then refresh the CRM check before saving. Keep Sam on hold.
Context & open questions
- The early search brief
- UK design agencies with a sales-to-delivery handover. Look for the person responsible, not a title alone. Review three people before paid enrichment; exclude existing people and hold uncertain matches.
- Checks before action
- In the fictional run, existing contacts and person leads were checked before search. Returned candidates were matched before enrichment. Refresh those checks before saving or starting another batch.
- Sources and status
- Fit came from an agency team page; identity checks used profile URLs and available identifiers. One work email was returned. An email address does not prove buying interest or permission to contact.
- Cost in the example
- Illustrative enrichment charge: £1 against a £5 limit. These figures are invented for the example, not provider pricing.
Fictional example · reusable format
Example working brief
This shows what you can keep. Your agent creates your own brief from your conversation.
- Purpose and decisions
- Fictional example: find UK design-agency handover owners. Review a three-person sample before paid enrichment. Keep existing CRM people out; hold uncertain matches. New people at known companies can qualify.
- Search brief and reason
- Look for responsibility for the sales-to-delivery handover, supported by a source. A matching title alone is insufficient. Work email is the only enrichment field selected.
- Reviewed sample
- Maya Ellis, Juniper Studio: team page identifies handover responsibility; no matching CRM person; work email added (maya@juniper.example); not saved. Leo Anders, Form & Field: profile URL matches an existing Capable person; skipped without enrichment or changes. Sam Taylor, Kite Studio: possible name/company match; identity unresolved; held without enrichment.
- Coverage and evidence
- Within this fictional run, the relevant existing contacts and person leads were checked before search and again before enrichment. The examples use invented records and sources; no live CRM or provider was accessed. In a real run, incomplete coverage keeps execution pending.
- Example action status
- 3 found; 1 enriched; 0 saved. Of the 3 found, 1 existing person skipped and 1 uncertain match held. No outreach. The actual preview performs none of these actions.
- Example budget
- The fictional user agreed a £5 spending limit after sample review. Illustrative enrichment charge: £1. These are invented example amounts, not vendor prices or authorization for a real purchase.
- Pending work and next question
- Review Maya’s proposed record and refresh the CRM match immediately before saving. Resolve Sam’s identity without buying enrichment. Next question: would you like to review Maya’s record for saving, or investigate Sam’s possible match first?
- Owner and review point
- The fictional user reviews the sample before any further batch. No recurring search or sync is active. Reconfirm scope and remaining budget before continuing.
For your own brief, keep the real sample, sources, checks, costs, and action status together. Resume from the next open decision and refresh CRM checks before acting. These fictional records are only an example.
Your result will reflect your conversation. Keep it in your assistant or a document you choose.
How the tools fit together
- 01
Capable
Check existing people first
- 02
Chosen data tool
Search with supported exclusions
- 03
Your agent + you
Check matches, review, then enrich
- 04
Capable
Recheck and save only new people
Choose tools together. Execution depends on the connections and actions available in your assistant.
Read the full guide
Start wherever you are
Start with a goal or reuse criteria you have. You do not need a finished ICP or existing customers. Finding and enriching real prospects requires Capable access, a suitable data source, and verified CRM checks.
Figure it out together
- Agree a useful match
Work out criteria, exclusions, useful fields, and a manageable sample. Agree costs before paid work.
- Check Capable before searching
Establish reliable coverage of existing people before searching. If access or matching is incomplete, keep working on the plan until the checks can be completed.
- Review before enrichment
Check returned people against Capable. Skip known people, hold uncertain matches, and enrich only the new selection you review.
- Recheck and keep new people
Refresh the check before saving. Keep sources and fit notes, separating new people from skipped or unresolved matches.
Tools and connections
- Your AI assistant
- Shape criteria, coordinate available connections, and review results with you.
- FullEnrich or Apollo
- Possible options for finding people and enriching selected details. Choose one suitable tool and check access and credits.
- Clay as an alternative
- Search, enrichment, and enabled research workflows. Custom workflows may need setup in Clay.
- Capable
- Supply existing-person records for checks and hold reviewed new prospects through supported actions.
What you’ll keep
A useful result and a copyable working brief with your decisions, reasons, evidence, assumptions, actual status, pending actions, and next question. Bring it back when you’re ready to continue.
A useful first outcome
Selected new people match the criteria, known CRM people are excluded, uncertain matches are held, and sources, gaps, costs, and actual saving status are clear.
When to revisit it
Reuse the brief for another batch or changed criteria. Check Capable again before search, enrichment, and saving.